Decision‐making by the NICE Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee
Background This study explored the evidence base for recommendations by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee, the only NICE committee not to consider cost. The four potential recommendations are: Standard Arrangements (can be perfor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of surgery 2019-12, Vol.106 (13), p.1769-1774 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
This study explored the evidence base for recommendations by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee, the only NICE committee not to consider cost. The four potential recommendations are: Standard Arrangements (can be performed as routine practice in the NHS); Special Arrangements (can be done under certain conditions); Research Only; and Do Not Do.
Methods
Quantitative content analysis of data extracted from all published Interventional Procedure Guidance (IPG) for 2003–2018 (n = 496) was undertaken. All data were extracted independently by two researchers; disagreements were clarified by consensus. Data were tabulated, descriptive statistics produced, and regression analyses performed.
Results
The proportion of IPGs by recommendation was: 50·0 per cent Standard Arrangements; 37·2 per cent Special Arrangements; 11·1 per cent Research Only; and 1·6 per cent Do Not Do. There was a clear trend over time: the proportion of recommendations for Standard Arrangements decreased, whereas the evidence threshold increased. Adjusted mean numbers of patients in the evidence base by recommendation type were: Standard, 4867; Special, 709; Research Only, 386. Regression analyses confirmed that the year of recommendation, numbers of patients and levels of evidence all affected the likely recommendation.
Conclusion
This study suggests that the likelihood of achieving the most positive recommendation (Standard Arrangements) is decreasing, and that this is most likely due to evidential requirements becoming more demanding. These findings are distinct from those reported for other NICE committees, for which the cost and statistical superiority of new therapies are among the drivers of recommendations.
Antecedentes
Este estudio analiza los niveles de evidencia de las recomendaciones propuestas por el Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee del National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE), el único comité NICE que no tiene en consideración los costes en la guía para los procedimientos de intervención. Las cuatro recomendaciones potenciales son: disposiciones estándar (se pueden efectuar sin restricciones en el marco del NHS); disposiciones especiales (se pueden efectuar bajo ciertas condiciones), en el ámbito de la investigación solo; y no intervenir.
Métodos
Se realizó un análisis cuantitativo del contenido de todas las Interventional Procedure Guidance (IPG) publicadas entre 2003‐2018 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1323 1365-2168 |
DOI: | 10.1002/bjs.11334 |