Endoscopic submucosal dissection: Italian national survey on current practices, training and outcomes

Most of the evidence supporting endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) comes from Asia. European data are primarily reported by specialized referral centers and thus may not be representative of common European ESD practice. The aim of this study is to understand the current state of ESD practice ac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive and liver disease 2020-01, Vol.52 (1), p.64-71
Hauptverfasser: Maselli, Roberta, Iacopini, Federico, Azzolini, Francesco, Petruzziello, Lucio, Manno, Mauro, De Luca, Luca, Cecinato, Paolo, Fiori, Giancarla, Staiano, Teresa, Rosa Rizzotto, Erik, Angeletti, Stefano, Caruso, Angelo, Coppola, Franco, Andrisani, Gianluca, Viale, Edi, Missale, Guido, Panarese, Alba, Mazzocchi, Alessandro, Cesaro, Paola, Campanale, Mariachiara, Occhipinti, Pietro, Tarantino, Ottaviano, Crosta, Cristiano, Brosolo, Piero, Sferrazza, Sandro, Rondonotti, Emanuele, Amato, Arnaldo, Fuccio, Lorenzo, Costamagna, Guido, Repici, Alessandro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Most of the evidence supporting endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) comes from Asia. European data are primarily reported by specialized referral centers and thus may not be representative of common European ESD practice. The aim of this study is to understand the current state of ESD practice across Italian endoscopy centers. All Italian endoscopists who were known to perform ESD were invited to complete a structured questionnaire including: operator features and competencies, ESD training details and clinical outcomes over a 2-year period. Twenty-nine operators from 23 centers (69% response rate) completed the questionnaire: 18 (62%) were 80 cases. En-bloc resection rates ranged from 77.2 to 97.2% depending on the anatomic location with an R0 resection rate range of 75.3–93.6%. ESD perforation rates in the colon and rectum were significantly lower when experience was >150 compared to 80–150 cases (p 
ISSN:1590-8658
1878-3562
DOI:10.1016/j.dld.2019.09.009