Comparison by Pentafecta Criteria of Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Large Renal Tumors

To compare and analyze surgical and functional outcomes of transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (TRPN) and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RRPN) in localized renal tumors, including ≥4 cm renal masses. Of 566 consecutive patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy by a sin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endourology 2020-02, Vol.34 (2), p.175-183
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Chang Il, Kang, Minyong, Sung, Hyun Hwan, Jeon, Hwang Gyun, Jeong, Byong Chang, Jeon, Seong Soo, Lee, Hyun Moo, Seo, Seong Il
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare and analyze surgical and functional outcomes of transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (TRPN) and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (RRPN) in localized renal tumors, including ≥4 cm renal masses. Of 566 consecutive patients who underwent robotic partial nephrectomy by a single surgeon from December 2008 through July 2017, records for 523 patients who were preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively evaluated were analyzed for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Primary endpoint was a comparison of Pentafecta criteria (negative surgical margin, no 30-day complications, warm ischemic time [WIT] ≤25 minutes, return of eGFR to >90% from baseline, and no upstaging of chronic kidney disease) between TRPN and RRPN. Secondary endpoint was finding predictors for Pentafecta achievement. In all 523 patients, these Pentafecta criteria were lower for RRPN than TRPN: operation time (  
ISSN:0892-7790
1557-900X
DOI:10.1089/end.2019.0410