Direct comparison of the specialised blood fibrosis tests FibroMeterV2G and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score in patients with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease from tertiary care centres
Summary Background The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score (ELF) and the FibroMeterV2G are two specialized blood fibrosis tests which include direct markers of liver fibrosis. They have been shown to be more accurate than the simple blood fibrosis tests FIB4 and the non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFL...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics 2019-12, Vol.50 (11-12), p.1214-1222 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
Background
The Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score (ELF) and the FibroMeterV2G are two specialized blood fibrosis tests which include direct markers of liver fibrosis. They have been shown to be more accurate than the simple blood fibrosis tests FIB4 and the non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score (NFS).
Aims
To directly compare the accuracies of ELF and FibroMeterV2G for the non‐invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in NAFLD.
Methods
Four hundred and seventeen patients with biopsy‐proven NAFLD were enrolled from two tertiary care centres. Four blood fibrosis tests were calculated: ELF, FibroMeterV2G, NFS, and FIB4. Advanced fibrosis F3/4 on liver biopsy (NASH CRN scoring) was the primary endpoint.
Results
Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for advanced fibrosis were not significantly different between the direct markers of liver fibrosis (hyaluronate, PIIINP, TIMP‐1, alpha2‐macroglobulin) and the simple blood fibrosis tests NFS and FIB4. ELF (0.793 ± 0.022) and FibroMeterV2G (0.804 ± 0.021) had significantly higher AUROC than NFS (0.722 ± 0.025, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0269-2813 1365-2036 |
DOI: | 10.1111/apt.15529 |