Comparison of two point of care whole blood coagulation analysis devices and conventional coagulation tests as a predicting tool of perioperative bleeding in adult cardiac surgery—a pilot prospective observational study in Japan

BACKGROUND It is widely accepted that Point‐of Care Test (PoCT) devices are useful in the detection of coagulopathies in situations of massive bleeding such as major cardiac surgery. These devices contribute to the reduction of blood transfusion. However, their implementation remains limited in Japan because of their cost and lack of health insurance support. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Conventional coagulation tests and thromboelastography (TEG)/Sonoclot values were measured in 50 consecutive cardiac surgery cases. Clinical background information such as operative procedures was obtained from electronic medical records, and the theoretical perioperative total blood loss was calculated by measuring the hemoglobin content and total red blood cell transfusion volume. The correlation between perioperative total blood loss and the measured laboratory values or clinical parameters was evaluated by a multivariate linear regression analysis. The risk factors of the total amount of platelet transfusion and postoperative drain bleeding volume were similarly evaluated. RESULTS No significant association between the estimated perioperative total blood loss (eTBL) and the laboratory measurements including conventional coagulation tests, TEG and Sonoclot was observed. On the other hand, postoperative drain bleeding volume was significantly associated with postoperative Sonoclot CR (p = 0.039) as well as preoperative use of oral anticoagulants and cell saver treated blood volume. Platelet transfusion amount was significantly associated with post‐CBP PF and time to peak value of Sonoclot (p = 0.014 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION Sonoclot measurements may be useful to estimate the risks of postoperative bleeding and platelet transfusion in cardiac surgeries in Japan.