Post-procedural tricuspid regurgitation predicts long-term survival in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair

•Post-procedural TR predicts long-term survival in PMVR patients.•TR improved in patients after PMVR.•Echocardiographic pulmonary pressure is decreased post PMVR.•TR is associated with more severe heart failure symptoms in PMVR patients. Functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is frequently present...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiology 2019-12, Vol.74 (6), p.524-531
Hauptverfasser: Bannehr, Marwin, Kahn, Ulrike, Okamoto, Maki, Kaneko, Hidehiro, Hähnel, Valentin, Neuß, Michael, Haase-Fielitz, Anja, Butter, Christian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Post-procedural TR predicts long-term survival in PMVR patients.•TR improved in patients after PMVR.•Echocardiographic pulmonary pressure is decreased post PMVR.•TR is associated with more severe heart failure symptoms in PMVR patients. Functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is frequently present in patients with severe mitral regurgitation and is associated with worse outcome. While percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) is on the increase, the role of TR in those patients is unclear. This study aimed to compare pre- and post-procedural TR and investigated the impact of post-procedural TR and major clinical risk factors on long-term survival in patients undergoing PMVR. In this retrospective observational cohort study, data from 213 consecutive patients at a tertiary care center undergoing PMVR from 2010 to 2016 were analyzed. Two different groups, dichotomized according to the degree of TR (none/mild and moderate/severe) were compared. Multivariable analyses were performed assessing predictors for long-term survival adjusting for major risk factors. Following PMVR TR was significantly reduced by at least 1 grade in 23.0% (p=0.001), while echocardiographic pulmonary pressure was decreased (TR Vmax 3.21±0.49m/s vs. 2.98±0.53m/s; p=
ISSN:0914-5087
1876-4738
DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.05.009