The STARflo™ glaucoma implant: a single-centre experience at 24 months
Purpose To evaluate the 24-month outcomes following STARflo™ implantation in patients with moderate or advanced open-angle glaucoma. Methods We enrolled 32 patients (40 eyes) with high intraocular pressure (IOP) resistant to topical and systemic medical therapy. After baseline assessments, patients...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2019-12, Vol.257 (12), p.2699-2706 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To evaluate the 24-month outcomes following STARflo™ implantation in patients with moderate or advanced open-angle glaucoma.
Methods
We enrolled 32 patients (40 eyes) with high intraocular pressure (IOP) resistant to topical and systemic medical therapy. After baseline assessments, patients were implanted with STARflo™ implants with the goal of IOP reduction and long-term maintenance. Patients were followed for 24 months. Complete success of implantation was defined as a restoration of normal IOP without topical glaucoma medications, while qualified success was defined as a restoration of normal IOP with implantation and topical glaucoma medications.
Results
STARflo™ did not satisfactorily reduce IOP at 24 months. Twenty-eight eyes (70%) had elevated IOP at least once during the 24 months post-implantation period. Five eyes (12.5%) developed corneal decompensation. The average IOP 24 months after the surgery was 13.42 ± 6.03 mmHg and was not significantly different than IOP at 12 months (13.2 ± 5.59 mmHg). Moreover, 45% of treated eyes needed additional glaucoma procedures after 1 year and 2 years to achieve these IOPs. STARflo™ did reduce the average number of topical glaucoma medications from 2.7 pre-implantation to 1.17 at 24 months postoperatively in the rest 55% of the eyes.
Conclusions
The STARflo™ implantation did not meet success criteria and so appears to be an ineffective alternative to filtering surgical procedures for patients with treatment-refractory open-angle glaucoma. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0721-832X 1435-702X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00417-019-04461-5 |