Clinical and economic benefits of de-escalating stress ulcer prophylaxis therapy in the intensive care unit: A quality improvement study

Stress ulcer prophylaxis is commonly prescribed in the intensive care unit but can be inappropriately commenced or continued on discharge, exposing patients to potential harm. We aimed to evaluate whether a prescribing guideline, education program and pharmacist oversight would reduce inappropriate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia and intensive care 2019-11, Vol.47 (6), p.503-509
Hauptverfasser: Anstey, Matthew H, Litton, Edward, Palmer, Robert N, Neppalli, Sneha, Tan, Benedict J, Hawkins, David J, Krishnamurthy, Ravi B, Jacques, Angela, Sonawane, Ravikiran V, Chapman, Andrew R, Norman, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Stress ulcer prophylaxis is commonly prescribed in the intensive care unit but can be inappropriately commenced or continued on discharge, exposing patients to potential harm. We aimed to evaluate whether a prescribing guideline, education program and pharmacist oversight would reduce inappropriate continuation of stress ulcer prophylaxis. This was a multicentre pre- (2014) and post- (2016) quality improvement study across five Australian intensive care units. Cost data were estimated using local information about prescribing patterns, and the relationship between long-term use and adverse events. A total of 531 patients were included in the pre- and 393 in the post-implementation periods. The proportion of hospital survivors inappropriately continued on stress ulcer prophylaxis reduced from 78/184 (42.4%) to 11/143 (7.7%) in the post-implementation period (odds ratio1/48.83; 95% confidence interval 4.47-17.45; P
ISSN:0310-057X
1448-0271
DOI:10.1177/0310057X19860972