The influence of neurological examination timing within hours after acute traumatic spinal cord injuries: an observational study

Study design Cohort study. Objectives It is widely accepted that the prediction of long-term neurologic outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) can be done more accurately with neurological examinations conducted days to weeks post injury. However, modern clinical trials of neuroprotective interventions often require patients be examined and enrolled within hours. Our objective was to determine whether variability in timing of neurological examinations within 48 h after SCI is associated with differences in observations of follow-up neurologic recovery. Setting Level I trauma hospital. Methods An observational analysis testing for differences in AIS conversion rates and changes in total motor scores by neurological examination timing, controlling for potential confounders with multivariate stepwise regression. Results We included 85 patients, whose mean times from injury to baseline and follow-up examinations were 11.8 h (SD 9.8) and 208.2 days (SD 75.2), respectively. AIS conversion by 1+ grade was significantly more likely in patients examined at ≤4 h in comparison with later examination (78% versus 47%, RR = 1.66, p = 0.04), even after controlling for timing of surgery, age, and sex (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.1–10, p = 0.04). We failed to identify any statistically significant associations for total motor score recovery in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. Conclusions AIS grade conversion was significantly more likely in those examined ≤4 h of injury; the effect of timing on motor scores remains uncertain. Variability in neurological examination timing within hours after acute traumatic SCI may influence observations of long-term neurological recovery, which could introduce bias or lead to errors in interpretation of studies of therapeutic interventions.