Digest: Does sexual conflict complicate a trade-off between fecundity and survival?
Why do some species exhibit apparently suboptimal combinations of life history traits? In a comparative study of lizard species, Reedy et al. test the idea that variation in the trade-off between fecundity and survival can be explained by sexual conflict. Their results show that degree of sexual con...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evolution 2019-11, Vol.73 (11), p.2347-2348 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Why do some species exhibit apparently suboptimal combinations of life history traits? In a comparative study of lizard species, Reedy et al. test the idea that variation in the trade-off between fecundity and survival can be explained by sexual conflict. Their results show that degree of sexual conflict alone cannot explain this variation, and they found a positive correlation between tradeoff optimality and the size of males relative to females. These findings suggest a more complicated picture of the fecundity-survival trade-off, possibly involving a third, unknown source of selective pressure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-3820 1558-5646 |
DOI: | 10.1111/evo.13855 |