Comparison of Photochemical Crosslinking Versus Sutures for Bonding Conjunctival Grafts

Background and Objectives To explore whether Rose Bengal‐induced photochemical crosslinking (RB‐PCL) can be a replacement for sutures in conjunctival autograft bonding, we compared the safety, operating time, postoperative ocular signs, and inflammatory responses of RB‐PCL versus nylon suturing for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2020-07, Vol.52 (6), p.543-551
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Yan, Zhu, Lu, Zhu, Jingyin, Shen, Nianci, Yao, Min, Yu, Yan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objectives To explore whether Rose Bengal‐induced photochemical crosslinking (RB‐PCL) can be a replacement for sutures in conjunctival autograft bonding, we compared the safety, operating time, postoperative ocular signs, and inflammatory responses of RB‐PCL versus nylon suturing for sealing conjunctival autografts in rabbits. Study Design/Materials and Methods Thirty‐six New Zealand White rabbits underwent limbal conjunctival autografting using either sutures or RB‐PCL to attach conjunctival autografts to the bare sclera. Animals were randomized to one of two groups (18 per group): the suture group or RB‐PCL group. Photochemical crosslinking with a wavelength of 532 nm green light with an illumination intensity of 0.6 W/cm2 for 250 seconds (150 J/cm2) or suturing was performed followed by light examination at 3, 7, 28 days after surgery to evaluate the healing condition. Rabbits in each group were euthanized on day 3 (n = 6), 7 (n = 6), or 28 (n = 6) postoperatively, and the graft tissues from the surgical site were processed to evaluate inflammatory response by assessing protein levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF‐α), and interleukin 6 (IL‐6) as well as histological examination. Cell viability was evaluated by counting both total and dead cells on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue samples from both groups at 3 and 7 days after surgery. The surgery procedure time was recorded and the graft surface temperatures were measured before and after illumination. Results Photochemical crosslinking effectively secured the limbal conjunctival autograft over an ocular conjunctival defect with no significant difference from the suture group. The time required for this light activated bonding method was ~550 seconds in comparison with the suture method of half hour. The differences of measured temperature on the graft surface before and after RB‐PCL treatment were 2.98 ± 0.11°C. The induction of IL‐6 and TNF‐α protein was remarkably reduced in the RB‐PCL group compared with the suture group at 3 and 7 days after surgery. Histology revealed less infiltrated neutrophils were observed in the RB‐PCL group than in the suture group at 3 and 7 days postoperatively. Furthermore, the RB‐PCL group showed a better healing process with less eye discharge and mild conjunctival congestion. No significant difference in percent dead cells was observed between RB‐PCL and suture groups at 3 and 7 days after surgery. Conclusions RB‐PCL is a promising alternativ
ISSN:0196-8092
1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.23169