Frequency of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Diffuse Myocardial Fibrosis (Measured by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is frequently accompanied by co-morbidities and a systemic proinflammatory state, resulting in coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), as well as myocardial fibrosis. The purpose of this study is to examine the relation between myocardial perf...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of cardiology 2019-11, Vol.124 (10), p.1584-1589
Hauptverfasser: Löffler, Adrián I., Pan, Jonathan A., Balfour, Pelbreton C., Shaw, Peter W., Yang, Yang, Nasir, Moiz, Auger, Daniel A., Epstein, Frederick H., Kramer, Christopher M., Gan, Li-Ming, Salerno, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is frequently accompanied by co-morbidities and a systemic proinflammatory state, resulting in coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), as well as myocardial fibrosis. The purpose of this study is to examine the relation between myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) and diffuse myocardial fibrosis in patients with HFpEF using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. A single center study was performed in 19 patients with clinical HFpEF and 15 healthy control subjects who underwent quantitative first-pass perfusion imaging to calculate global MPR. T1 mapping was used to assess fibrosis and to calculate extracellular volume. Spiral cine displacement encoded stimulated echo was used to calculate myocardial strain. Comprehensive 2D echocardiograms with speckle tracking, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and brain natriuretic peptide levels were also obtained. In patients with HFpEF, mean left ventricular EF was 61% ± 9% and left ventricular mass index 45 ± 12 g/m2. Compared with controls, HFpEF patients had reduced global MPR (2.29 ± 0.64 vs 3.38 ± 0.76, p = 0.002) and VO2 max (16.5 ± 6.8 vs 30.9 ± 7.7 ml/kg min, p
ISSN:0002-9149
1879-1913
DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.08.011