Using Trauma Triage Score to Risk-Stratify Inpatient Triage, Hospital Quality Measures, and Cost in Middle-Aged and Geriatric Orthopaedic Trauma Patients

OBJECTIVES:To investigate the efficacy of a novel geriatric trauma risk assessment tool [Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA)] designed to predict inpatient mortality to risk-stratify measures of hospital quality and cost of care in middle-aged and geriatric orthopaedic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2019-10, Vol.33 (10), p.525-530
Hauptverfasser: Konda, Sanjit R, Lott, Ariana, Saleh, Hesham, Lyon, Thomas, Egol, Kenneth A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVES:To investigate the efficacy of a novel geriatric trauma risk assessment tool [Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA)] designed to predict inpatient mortality to risk-stratify measures of hospital quality and cost of care in middle-aged and geriatric orthopaedic trauma patients. DESIGN:Prospective cohort study. SETTING:Academic medical center. PATIENTS:One thousand five hundred ninety-two patients 55 years of age and older who were evaluated by orthopaedic surgery in the emergency department between October 1, 2014, and September 30, 2016. INTERVENTION:Calculation of the inpatient mortality risk score (STTGMA) using each patientʼs demographics, injury severity, and functional status. Patients were stratified into minimal-, low-, moderate-, and high-risk cohort groups based on risk of 5%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:Length of stay, complications, disposition, readmission, and cost. RESULTS:One thousand two hundred seventy-eight patients (80.3%) sustained low-energy injuries and 314 patients (19.7%) sustained high-energy injuries. The average age was 73.8 ± 11.8 years. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.2 days with a significant difference between the STTGMA risk groups. This risk stratification between groups was also seen in complication rate, need for Intensive Care Unit/Step Down Unit care, percentage of patients discharged, and readmission within 30-days. The mean total cost of admission for the minimal-risk group was less than one-third that of the high-risk cohort. CONCLUSIONS:The STTGMA tool is able to risk-stratify hospital quality outcome measures and cost. Thus, it is a valuable clinical tool for health care providers in identifying high-risk patients in efforts to continue to provide high-quality resource conscious care to orthopaedic trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
ISSN:0890-5339
1531-2291
DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000001561