Ablative fractional resurfacing with laser‐facilitated steroid delivery for burn scar management: Does the depth of laser penetration matter?

Background and Objective To investigate whether the depth of ablative fractional CO2 laser (CO2‐AFL) penetration of pathological burn scars influences clinical outcomes. Study Design/Materials and Methods All patients presenting to the Concord Repatriation General Hospital (CRGH) Scar Clinic receive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2020-02, Vol.52 (2), p.149-158
Hauptverfasser: Issler‐Fisher, Andrea C., Fisher, Oliver M., Haertsch, Peter, Li, Zhe, Maitz, Peter K.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background and Objective To investigate whether the depth of ablative fractional CO2 laser (CO2‐AFL) penetration of pathological burn scars influences clinical outcomes. Study Design/Materials and Methods All patients presenting to the Concord Repatriation General Hospital (CRGH) Scar Clinic received ultrasound measurement at the thickest point of their burn scars. Subsequently, the effect of various CO2‐AFL settings (energy which correlates to penetration depths) on different outcome parameters was analysed. Patients were divided into five groups depending on minimal scar penetration depth. Results Seventy‐eight patients (158 scars) had complete data allowing for analysis. Median scar thickness was 3,400 μm and median laser scar penetration depth was 900 μm. Scar penetration categories were as follows: 0–25% (n = 40), 25–50% (n = 67), 50–75% (n = 31), 75–100% (n = 8), >100% (n = 3) of scar thickness. The median reduction in maximum scar thickness was 800 μm following one treatment (P 100% indicated a tendency to become worse. Other assessed outcome parameters included: the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, a neuropathic pain score (DN4 Pain Questionnaire), and a pruritus score (modified D4 Pruritus Score). All these factors showed significant improvement in the categories up to 75% scar penetration depth. Conclusions CO2‐AFL scar penetration depth significantly influences subjective and objective pathologic burn scar modulation. The penetration depth of 51–75% achieves the greatest reduction in scar thickness. Lasers Surg. Med. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN:0196-8092
1096-9101
DOI:10.1002/lsm.23166