Robot-assisted Vs Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for High-stage Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-center Study

To compare robot assisted to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, in terms of efficacy, in the treatment of high-stage pelvic organ prolapse. This was a noninferiority prospective randomized trial conducted in a tertiary Urology unit, comparing robot assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2019-12, Vol.134, p.116-123
Hauptverfasser: Illiano, Ester, Ditonno, Pasquale, Giannitsas, Konstantinos, De Rienzo, Gaetano, Bini, Vittorio, Costantini, Elisabetta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare robot assisted to laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, in terms of efficacy, in the treatment of high-stage pelvic organ prolapse. This was a noninferiority prospective randomized trial conducted in a tertiary Urology unit, comparing robot assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in patients with symptomatic prolapse stage III and IV, according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse quantification. All participants provided written informed consent at enrolment. The primary outcome was prolapse objective cure rate. Secondary outcomes included prevalence of urinary, anorectal and sexual symptoms, UDI-6, IIQ7 and FSFI scores, and maximum flow rate. Operative times, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, postsurgery pain, patient satisfaction as well as surgical and mesh complications were assessed. The Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests for unpaired and paired data, respectively, were used to compare ordinal and nonnormally distributed continuous variables. Categorical data were analyzed by the McNemar, chi-square or Fisher exact test. Two-tailed P 
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.043