Resting heart rate and its dynamic change and the risk of hypertension: The Rural Chinese Cohort Study

The sex- and age-specific relation in the association of resting heart rate (RHR) and its change and risk of hypertension remains unclear. We prospectively estimated the incidence of hypertension among 9969 nonhypertensive adults participating in The Rural Chinese Cohort Study. Self-reported questio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of human hypertension 2020-07, Vol.34 (7), p.528-535
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Yang, Qin, Pei, Sun, Haohang, Yin, Zhaoxia, Li, Honghui, Sun, Xizhuo, Liu, Feiyan, Ren, Yongcheng, Liu, Dechen, Chen, Xu, Liu, Leilei, Cheng, Cheng, Zhou, Qionggui, Zhang, Ming, Liu, Yu, Hu, Dongsheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The sex- and age-specific relation in the association of resting heart rate (RHR) and its change and risk of hypertension remains unclear. We prospectively estimated the incidence of hypertension among 9969 nonhypertensive adults participating in The Rural Chinese Cohort Study. Self-reported questionnaires and anthropometric and laboratory measurements were collected at baseline (2007–2008) and follow-up (2013–2014). The modified Poisson regression model was used to calculate relative risk (RR) values and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident hypertension associated with RHR and its dynamic change. During follow-up (median, 6.01 years), 797 (20.28%) men, and 1178 (19.51%) women developed hypertension. Risk of hypertension was increased for women with the highest versus lowest RHR tertile after adjusting for confounding factors (RR: 1.19 [95%CI: 1.04–1.36]) and was associated with increased RHR for women with young age (RR per 10-beat/min RHR increase, 1.25 [95%CI: 1.09–1.43]), middle age (1.06 [0.99–1.14]), and older age (1.11 [1.01–1.23]). Risk of developing hypertension was significantly higher (RR: 1.22 [95%CI: 1.04–1.42]) in women with high RHR (≥80-beat/min) throughout the study period than those with normal RHR (
ISSN:0950-9240
1476-5527
DOI:10.1038/s41371-019-0259-y