Dose-optimized computed tomography of the cervical spine in patients with shoulder pull-down: Is image quality comparable with a standard dose protocol in an emergency setting?
•Soft tissue and bone superimposition is a limiting factor in computed tomography of the cervical spine.•Cervical spine CT with dose reduction showed no image quality impairment.•Low shoulder position is crucial for optimization of CT-imaging of the cervical spine. Superimposing soft tissue and bony...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of radiology 2019-11, Vol.120, p.108655-108655, Article 108655 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Soft tissue and bone superimposition is a limiting factor in computed tomography of the cervical spine.•Cervical spine CT with dose reduction showed no image quality impairment.•Low shoulder position is crucial for optimization of CT-imaging of the cervical spine.
Superimposing soft tissue and bony structures in computed tomography (CT) of the cervical spine (C-spine) is a limiting factor in optimizing radiation exposure maintaining an acceptable image quality. Therefore, we assessed image quality of dose-optimized (DO) C-spine CT in patients capable of shoulder pull-down in an emergency setting.
DO-CT (105mAs/120 kVp) of the C-spine in trauma settings was performed in patients with shoulder pull-down if C5 was not superimposed by soft tissue on the lateral topogram, otherwise standard-dose (SD)-CT (195 mAs/120 kVp) was performed. 34 DO (mean age, 68y ± 21; BMI, 24.2 kg/m2 ± 3.2) and 34 SD (mean age 70y ± 19; BMI 25.7 kg/m2 ± 4.4) iterative reconstructed CTs were evaluated at C2/3 and C6/7 by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Qualitative image noise and morphological characteristics of bony structures (cortex, trabeculae) were assessed on a Likert scale. Quantitative image noise was measured and effective dose (ED) was recorded. Parameters were compared using Mann-Whitney-U-test (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108655 |