Development and Application of Real-Time and Conventional SSR-PCR Assays for Rapid and Sensitive Detection of Didymella pisi Associated with Ascochyta Blight of Dry Pea
is the primary causal pathogen of Ascochyta blight (AB) of dry pea in Montana. Diagnosis of AB is challenging because there are six different species that cause AB worldwide and that can co-occur. Additionally, agar plate identification of is challenging due to its slow growth rate. Currently, there...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant disease 2019-11, Vol.103 (11), p.2751-2758 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | is the primary causal pathogen of Ascochyta blight (AB) of dry pea in Montana. Diagnosis of AB is challenging because there are six different species that cause AB worldwide and that can co-occur. Additionally, agar plate identification of
is challenging due to its slow growth rate. Currently, there are no PCR-based assays developed for specific detection of
or any fungal pathogen in the AB complex of dry pea. In this study, we evaluated simple sequence repeat (SSR) primer pairs for their specificity and sensitivity in real-time and conventional SSR-PCR both in vitro and in planta. The specificity of the assay was determined by testing DNA of 10 dry pea varieties, fungal species in the AB complex, and fungal species associated with dry pea. To avoid false-negative results, plant and fungal DNA markers were included as controls in a conventional multiplex SSR-PCR, to amplify any plant or fungal DNA in the absence of the
SSR target. SYBR Green SSR-quantitative PCR (qPCR) detection was conducted using the same primer pairs but in a uniplex format.
was specifically amplified, whereas other fungi and host DNA were not. Also, sensitivity experiments showed that the detection limit was 0.01 ng of DNA of
for both assays and 100 conidia in SSR-qPCR. These assays are valuable diagnostic tools for the detection of |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0191-2917 1943-7692 |
DOI: | 10.1094/PDIS-02-19-0381-RE |