Process, impact and outcomes of medication review in Australian residential aged care facilities: A systematic review

Objective To systematically review literature reporting processes, impact and outcomes of medication review and reconciliation in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Informit Health and grey literature were searched from 1995 to July 2018. Stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australasian journal on ageing 2019-09, Vol.38 (S2), p.9-25
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Esa Y. H., Wang, Kate N., Sluggett, Janet K., Ilomäki, Jenni, Hilmer, Sarah N., Corlis, Megan, Bell, J. Simon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To systematically review literature reporting processes, impact and outcomes of medication review and reconciliation in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Informit Health and grey literature were searched from 1995 to July 2018. Studies reporting outcomes of a stand‐alone medication review or reconciliation interventions in Australian RACFs were included. Results Thirteen studies investigated medication review, eight of which studied Residential Medication Management Reviews (RMMRs). Five studies reported that medication reviews identified an average of 2.7‐3.9 medication‐related problems (MRPs) per resident. One study reported medication reviews had no impact on quality of life, hospitalisation or mortality, but was not powered to assess these. Three studies reported general practitioners’ acceptance of pharmacists’ recommendations to resolve MRPs, ranging between 45 and 84%. Conclusions Medication review may be a useful strategy to identify and prompt resolution of MRPs. However, the impact on clinical and resident‐centred outcomes remains unclear.
ISSN:1440-6381
1741-6612
DOI:10.1111/ajag.12676