Performance of Dynamic Automated CT Annular Measurements Compared to Standard Manual Measurements for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Sizing

We sought to determine the performance of an automated computed tomography (CT) software that provides dynamic annular measurements of all available cardiac phases for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) sizing as compared to the standard single manual measurement. In 60 TAVR patients (84±...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging 2019-08, Vol.1 (3)
Hauptverfasser: Truong, Quynh A, Legasto, Alan C, Deaño, Roderick C, Bachman, Daniel P, Bhatt, Deep, Al'Aref, Subhi J, Devereux, Richard B, Wong, S Chiu, Salemi, Arash, Szymonifka, Jackie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We sought to determine the performance of an automated computed tomography (CT) software that provides dynamic annular measurements of all available cardiac phases for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) sizing as compared to the standard single manual measurement. In 60 TAVR patients (84±7 years, 60% male) who underwent pre-procedural CT scans, we measured the aortic annular diameters, perimeter, and area using (1) the dynamic automated CT measurements and (2) standard single manual measurement from the cardiac phase of maximum systolic opening by visual estimate. The automated software was successful in providing annular measurements in 43/60 (72%) of cases, with the remainder requiring semi-automated contours. The maximum dynamic automated values were predominantly in systole (46/60[77%] for diameter, 44/60[73%] for perimeter, 48/60[80%] for area), and was a different phase from the standard manual phase in 46/60 (77%) cases. The maximum dynamic automated annular values were larger than the standard manual values measured (Δdiameter 0.35 mm, p=0.04; Δperimeter 1.71 mm, p
ISSN:2638-6135
DOI:10.1148/ryct.2019180025