Additional cavotricuspid isthmus block ablation may not improve the outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation

Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF). The role of additional cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block ablation remains controversial in AF patients without atrial flutter (AFL). Therefore, this study aimed to explore the clinical outcome of additional C...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2019-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1421-1428
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Wei‐Chieh, Fang, Hsiu‐Yu, Chen, Huang‐Chung, Chen, Yung‐Lung, Tsai, Tzu‐Hsien, Pan, Kuo‐Li, Lin, Yu‐Sheng, Chen, Mien‐Cheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF). The role of additional cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block ablation remains controversial in AF patients without atrial flutter (AFL). Therefore, this study aimed to explore the clinical outcome of additional CTI block ablation in patients without AFL. Methods Between January 2013 and December 2017, a total of 139 patients who did not have documented AFL and who underwent catheter ablation for AF were recruited. Fifty‐seven patients were classified in additional CTI block ablation group and 82 patients were classified in without CTI group. The incidence of early‐onset and late‐onset atrial arrhythmia recurrence was compared between the two groups. Results The additional CTI group had a higher prevalence of persistent or long‐standing AF and larger left atrial volume. The additional CTI group had a higher incidence of late‐onset atrial arrhythmia recurrence (38.6% vs 12.2%; P 
ISSN:0147-8389
1540-8159
DOI:10.1111/pace.13799