Additional cavotricuspid isthmus block ablation may not improve the outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation
Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF). The role of additional cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block ablation remains controversial in AF patients without atrial flutter (AFL). Therefore, this study aimed to explore the clinical outcome of additional C...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2019-11, Vol.42 (11), p.1421-1428 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aims
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective procedure for atrial fibrillation (AF). The role of additional cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) block ablation remains controversial in AF patients without atrial flutter (AFL). Therefore, this study aimed to explore the clinical outcome of additional CTI block ablation in patients without AFL.
Methods
Between January 2013 and December 2017, a total of 139 patients who did not have documented AFL and who underwent catheter ablation for AF were recruited. Fifty‐seven patients were classified in additional CTI block ablation group and 82 patients were classified in without CTI group. The incidence of early‐onset and late‐onset atrial arrhythmia recurrence was compared between the two groups.
Results
The additional CTI group had a higher prevalence of persistent or long‐standing AF and larger left atrial volume. The additional CTI group had a higher incidence of late‐onset atrial arrhythmia recurrence (38.6% vs 12.2%; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0147-8389 1540-8159 |
DOI: | 10.1111/pace.13799 |