A novel DPP6 variant in Chinese families causes early repolarization syndrome

Previous studies demonstrated that variants in dipeptidyl aminopeptidase-like protein-6 (DPP6) are involved in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. However, its role in early repolarization syndrome (ERS) remains largely elusive. The aim of this study is to determine whether the novel DPP6-L747P var...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental cell research 2019-11, Vol.384 (1), p.111561-111561, Article 111561
Hauptverfasser: Ji, Cheng-Cheng, Yao, Feng-Juan, Cheng, Yun-Jiu, Yao, Hao, Fan, Jun, Chen, Xu-Miao, Zheng, Zi-Heng, Dong, Yu-Gang, Wu, Su-Hua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Previous studies demonstrated that variants in dipeptidyl aminopeptidase-like protein-6 (DPP6) are involved in idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. However, its role in early repolarization syndrome (ERS) remains largely elusive. The aim of this study is to determine whether the novel DPP6-L747P variant is associated with ERS, and explore the underlying mechanisms. In our study, whole genome sequencing was used to identify a genetic variant in 4 Chinese families with sudden cardiac arrest induced by ERS. Then, wild-type (WT) DPP6 or mutant (c.2240T > C/p.L747P) DPP6 were respectively expressed in HEK293 cells, co-expressed with KV4.3 and KChIP2. Western blotting, immunofluorescence, and whole-cell patch clamp experiments were performed to reveal possible underlying mechanisms. A novel missense variant (c.2240T > C/p.L747P) in DPP6 was identified in the 4 families. Both DPP6-WT and DPP6-L747P were mainly located on the cell membrane. Compared with DPP6-WT, the intensity of DPP6 protein bands was downregulated in DPP6-L747P. Functional experiments showed that macroscopic currents exhibited an increase in DPP6-L747P, and the current intensity of DPP6-L747P was increased more than that of DPP6-WT (63.1 ± 8.2 pA/pF vs.86.5 ± 15.1 pA/pF at +50 mV, P 
ISSN:0014-4827
1090-2422
DOI:10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111561