A new and simplified comprehensive ultrasound protocol of haemophilic joints: the Universal Simplified Ultrasound (US-US) protocol
To present a new protocol to optimise ultrasound (US) assessment of haemophilic arthropathy. Ultrasound of haemophilic arthropathy joints was performed using three different ultrasound protocols, namely, the Toronto-Vellore Comprehensive Ultrasound (TVC-US) protocol, the Haemophilia Early Arthropath...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical radiology 2019-11, Vol.74 (11), p.897.e9-897.e16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To present a new protocol to optimise ultrasound (US) assessment of haemophilic arthropathy.
Ultrasound of haemophilic arthropathy joints was performed using three different ultrasound protocols, namely, the Toronto-Vellore Comprehensive Ultrasound (TVC-US) protocol, the Haemophilia Early Arthropathy Detection with Ultrasound (HEAD-US), and the newly developed Universal Simplified Ultrasound (US-US) protocol. Synovial hypertrophy, haemosiderin deposition, effusion, erosion, and cartilage loss were evaluated in 20 joints. The reliability and diagnostic efficiency of these protocols was compared using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
The correlation between the TVC-US and US-US protocols for synovial hypertrophy was excellent: kappa significance (KS) was 1, but was substantial (KS=0.65) with the HEAD-US protocol. For effusion, both the TVC-US and the HEAD-US protocols had substantial correlation with the US-US protocol (KS=0.7 and 0.6 respectively). The correlation for erosion and cartilage loss was excellent between the TVC-US and the US-US with MRI (KS=1), but poor (KS=0) with the HEAD-US protocol. The US-US protocol also had good interobserver agreement (KS=1).
The accuracy of the US-US protocol is comparable to the TVC-US protocol and MRI and is superior to the HEAD-US protocol in the assessment of haemophilic arthropathy.
•Ultrasound is less expensive, avoids radiation and detects arthropathy changes before they are seen on the plain radiograph.•Comprehensive US protocols are elaborate and time consuming and POC US protocols have risk of missing crucial findings.•US-US protocol is faster, has the advantage of retaining information like comprehensive protocol and is comparable with MRI. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0009-9260 1365-229X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.crad.2019.07.018 |