Assessing the Effect of Radiotherapy in Addition to Surgery in Colon Adenocarcinomas: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Contemporary Evidence

Purpose This study aims to review the contemporary evidence investigating radiotherapy (RT) in addition to surgery for colon adenocarcinomas. Methods We searched the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, ASCOpubs, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies (since January 2005)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal cancer 2020-06, Vol.51 (2), p.445-460
Hauptverfasser: Agas, Ryan Anthony F., Co, Lester Bryan A., Sogono, Paolo G., Jacinto, JC Kennetth M., Yu, Kelvin Ken L., Jacomina, Luisa E., Bacorro, Warren R., Sy Ortin, Teresa T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study aims to review the contemporary evidence investigating radiotherapy (RT) in addition to surgery for colon adenocarcinomas. Methods We searched the following databases: PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, ASCOpubs, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Studies (since January 2005) comparing outcomes of high-risk colon adenocarcinomas who underwent RT in addition to surgery versus no RT were eligible. Pooling of outcomes from published results or from analysis of survival curves was done. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine if the efficacy of RT varies with RT timing. Results Eight studies were included (five retrospective cohorts, three population-based studies). Pooled analysis from retrospective cohorts showed a reduction in 5-year LR (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.21–0.79; p  = 0.007) in the RT group. A benefit in 3-year (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.15–2.87; p  = 0.01) and 5-year (OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.21–3.63; p  = 0.008) DFS and in 3-year (OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.43–4.54; p  = 0.001) and 5-year (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.17–3.41; p  = 0.01) OS was seen in the RT group. The OS benefit was demonstrated in the subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant RT, but not with adjuvant RT. The improvement in OS with neoadjuvant RT was supported by a population-based study from NCDB, while results from two population-based studies investigating adjuvant RT were conflicting. Conclusion Taking into account the limitations of the studies, our review of evidence suggests a possible role of RT in improving oncologic outcomes of select colon adenocarcinomas. Prospective studies are needed to definitively assess the value of RT for colon cancer.
ISSN:1941-6628
1941-6636
DOI:10.1007/s12029-019-00300-2