Prospective randomized comparison of tongue base resection techniques: Robotic vs coblation
Objective The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness and morbidities of two different tongue base surgical approaches in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Design and Setting We carried out a prospective analysis in order to understand in detail the relative impact on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical otolaryngology 2019-11, Vol.44 (6), p.989-996 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness and morbidities of two different tongue base surgical approaches in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).
Design and Setting
We carried out a prospective analysis in order to understand in detail the relative impact on apnoeas of the two different tongue base procedures. Seventy cases in 85 patients with OSA were divided into two operating groups and randomized. Altogether, 37 transoral robotic surgeries (TORS) and 33 coblations were performed. The patency of retrolingual passage was investigated by Muller's manoeuvere, polysomnography. Apnoea‐hypopnea index (AHI) was the primary outcome measure with the Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS). The final follow‐up visit was at 6 months.
Results
The AHI index improved from 29.7 ± 9 to 10.7 ± 3.9 (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1749-4478 1749-4486 |
DOI: | 10.1111/coa.13424 |