Susceptibility based multiparametric quantification of liver disease: Non-invasive evaluation of steatosis and iron overload

To evaluate if single-voxel MR spectroscopy (MRS) of iron and fat correlates with biopsy results of hepatic steatosis and iron overload, and to compare MR-measurements with room-temperature susceptometer (RTS), ultrasound, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and serum ferritin. In this prospectiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance imaging 2019-11, Vol.63, p.114-122
Hauptverfasser: Uhrig, Monika, Mueller, Johannes, Longerich, Thomas, Straub, Beate Katharina, Buschle, Lukas R., Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter, Mueller, Sebastian, Ziener, Christian H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate if single-voxel MR spectroscopy (MRS) of iron and fat correlates with biopsy results of hepatic steatosis and iron overload, and to compare MR-measurements with room-temperature susceptometer (RTS), ultrasound, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and serum ferritin. In this prospective study, a set of 42 patients out of 47 screened patients with several chronic liver diseases underwent MRI-examination at 1.5 T including R2-measurements by single-voxel high-speed T2-corrected multiecho spectroscopy, additional liver biopsy, abdominal ultrasound, CAP, and RTS. Routine blood and serum parameters were determined, including ferritin. Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) and histologically confirmed extent of hepatic steatosis from liver biopsy were used as reference standard. For correlation of R2, RTS, CAP, ferritin, and ultrasound with results of AAS and histologically determined fat fraction of liver biopsy specimen, Spearman's and Pearson's correlation as well as receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis with cut-off values determined by maximizing Youden index was used. MRS iron assessment correlated best with AAS, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.715 (p 
ISSN:0730-725X
1873-5894
DOI:10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.016