Serious game is an effective learning method for primary health care education of medical students: A randomized controlled trial
•Learning based on a serious game is so effective as learning based on printed text.•Learning based on serious game promote students’ motivation.•To use serious game during learning process of medical doctors’ students could be a promising tool. The aim of this study was to compare the influence of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2019-10, Vol.130, p.103944-103944, Article 103944 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Learning based on a serious game is so effective as learning based on printed text.•Learning based on serious game promote students’ motivation.•To use serious game during learning process of medical doctors’ students could be a promising tool.
The aim of this study was to compare the influence of a serious game dedicated to primary health care with traditional learning methods on knowledge of undergraduate medical students.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted with undergraduate medical students. The students (n = 27) attended to an expositive leveling lesson regard the theme “Screening on Primary Health Care”, and answered to a baseline knowledge test, comprised by objective questions. Students were randomly allocated to the control and game groups, in which received a text-based material regarding “Screening on Primary Health Care” or were exposed to a serious game. An immediate knowledge test and a retention knowledge test, presenting the same questions of baseline test, were responded by students at the finish of exposure and four weeks later. The students also performed a survey evaluating the user experience on the serious game. Knowledge test scores were analysed by repeated measures ANOVA and paired sample t-test. User experience and expectation surveys were descriptively analyzed.
For the control group, the mean scores and standard deviation were 7.85 ± 0.99, 9.00 ± 1.87 and 7.69 ± 1.44 for baseline, immediate and retention knowledge tests, respectively; the score at immediate test was higher than for baseline and retention tests. The game group presented 7.07 ± 1.98, 8.00 ± 1.84 and 7.15 ± 1.41 for baseline, immediate and retention knowledge tests, respectively. The comparison between groups did not show differences at any moment (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1386-5056 1872-8243 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.004 |