Understanding outcome metrics of the revised NIOSH lifting equation

The interpretation of the calculated result of the revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (RNLE) has been problematic because the relationship of the calculated result to back injury risk has not always been either well understood nor consistently interpreted. During the revision of the ISO standard 11228–1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied ergonomics 2019-11, Vol.81, p.102897-102897, Article 102897
Hauptverfasser: Fox, Robert R., Lu, Ming-Lun, Occhipinti, Enrico, Jaeger, Matthias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The interpretation of the calculated result of the revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (RNLE) has been problematic because the relationship of the calculated result to back injury risk has not always been either well understood nor consistently interpreted. During the revision of the ISO standard 11228–1 (Manual lifting, lowering and carrying), an extensive literature review was conducted on validation studies of the RNLE. A systematic review of exposure-risk associations between the LI metrics and various low-back health outcomes from peer-reviewed epidemiological studies was conducted. Risk interpretations for different levels of calculated result of the RNLE are added to the ISO standard. Rationale for the risk interpretations is presented in this paper. •The NIOSH Lift Index alone reflects “exposure” and risk can be mapped to it.•Use a 1.5 Lift Index as the threshold between low and moderate risk for back pain.•Consider other lifting assessment methods to supplement the NIOSH equation.•Consider NIOSH lift equation extensions to address specific lifting situations.
ISSN:0003-6870
1872-9126
DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102897