Altering the Traditional Approach to Restorative Proctocolectomy After Subtotal Colectomy in Pediatric Patients
Restoration of intestinal continuity by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following subtotal colectomy may not require a temporary, protective ileostomy. Diversion contributes to patient discomfort, cost, and additional operative risk at the time of subsequent reversal. We compared the outcomes of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A 2019-10, Vol.29 (10), p.1207-1211 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Restoration of intestinal continuity by ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) following subtotal colectomy may not require a temporary, protective ileostomy. Diversion contributes to patient discomfort, cost, and additional operative risk at the time of subsequent reversal. We compared the outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing modified two-stage to three-stage IPAA after recovering from subtotal colectomy.
We reviewed children (age .05).
The modified two-stage approach to IPAA creation resulted in fewer hospital days compared to the three-stage approach. Considering the risks and patient burdens of diversion, further research is needed to assist in decisions regarding protective ileostomy after completion proctectomy with IPAA. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1092-6429 1557-9034 |
DOI: | 10.1089/lap.2019.0106 |