Instrumental assessment of myocardial function by doppler tissue imaging in children with congenital heart defects after surgical correction and its correlation with galectin-3 amount as biological marker of cardiac fibrosis

Introduction: Speed myocardial indicators and estimation of galectin-3 presented for estimation of myocardial dysfunction in children with congenital heart defects (CHD). The aim: Evaluate myocardial function while using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and galectin-3 in children with CHD after surgical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Wiadomości lekarskie (1960) 2019, Vol.72 (7), p.1281-1287
Hauptverfasser: Dudnyk, Veronika, Zborovska, Olha, Vyzhga, Yuilia, Khromykh, Kateryna, Zvenigorodska, Ganna, Popov, Vladymyr, Bakhnivskyi, Valentyn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction: Speed myocardial indicators and estimation of galectin-3 presented for estimation of myocardial dysfunction in children with congenital heart defects (CHD). The aim: Evaluate myocardial function while using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and galectin-3 in children with CHD after surgical correction. Materials and methods: We examined 184 children. The study assessed both ventricle systolic and diastolic performance by TDI in combination with tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Additionally, systolic (S') and diastolic (ratio E/E') TDI measurements were obtained at the lateral part of mitral annular, interventricular part, and lateral part of tricuspid valve (S`ma lateral, S` ma septal, S`ta lateral та E/E' malateral, E/E' maseptal, E/E' talateral). Galectin-3 amount in serum was detected by immune enzyme method by kit «HumanGalectin-3». Results: Compared to results of the healthy children systolic TDI measurements in patients with CHD were significantly lower: S` ma lateral 7,81±0,10 сm/s vs 9,85±0,28 сm/s, S` ta lateral 9,70±0,12 сm/s vs 12,8±0,17 сm/s and TAPSE, 1,48±0,02 vs 2,14±0,03 сm/s (р
ISSN:0043-5147
DOI:10.36740/WLek201907110