Comparison of sexual function in Tunisian women with rheumatoid arthritis and healthy controls

Objectives To evaluate sexual function in Tunisian women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare it with that in voluntary healthy controls. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study including 71 women with a confirmed diagnosis of RA according to the American College of Rheumatology/Europe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical rheumatology 2019-12, Vol.38 (12), p.3361-3365
Hauptverfasser: Alia, Fazaa, Rim, Ben Saad, Miladi, S., Ouenniche, K., Kassab, S., Chekili, S., Zakraoui, L., Abdelghani, K. Ben, Laatar, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To evaluate sexual function in Tunisian women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare it with that in voluntary healthy controls. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study including 71 women with a confirmed diagnosis of RA according to the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) 2010 Criteria and 71 healthy age-matched controls. Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were collected. Patients and controls were asked to complete the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). It contains 19 questions, assessing six areas of female sexual function in the previous 4 weeks. The sexual dysfunction was defined as an FSFI score less than or equal to 26.55. The patients’ self-perception of their sexuality was assessed, and the frequency of sexual intercourse was noted. Results The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction in women with RA was 49.3% versus 23.9% in controls, with a significant difference ( p  = 0.002). Comparison between both groups as regards the mean of area scores of FSFI revealed that desire, arousal, and satisfaction in patients with RA were significantly lower than those in the control group ( p  = 0.05, p  = 0.038, and p  = 0.024, respectively). The score of lubrification, orgasm, and pain was comparable between the two groups. In univariate analysis, a significant association was found between sexual dysfunction and pain ( p  = 0.001), tender joint counts ( p  = 0.04), DAS28 ESR ( p  = 0.043), fatigue ( p  = 0.028), and functional disability ( p  = 0.02). No association was found between sexual dysfunction and treatment. In multivariate analysis, only pain was a predictive factor of sexual dysfunction in patients ( p  = 0.05, OR = 1.26 [1.16–1.3]). Based on patients’ self-perception of their sexual function, 26.1% of patients reported a negative impact of RA on their sex life. According to them, the main factors influencing sexuality were joint pain (60.6%) and fatigue (51%). Moreover, 59% of patients reported a decrease in the frequency of sexual intercourse after the diagnosis of RA. However, no statistically significant difference was found between patients and controls in the frequency of sexual intercourse ( p  = 1). Conclusion Our study suggests that patients with RA experience high level of impairment of sexual function in comparison with a control group. Health providers must consider sexual function as an important part of quality of life. A therapeutic education directed to
ISSN:0770-3198
1434-9949
DOI:10.1007/s10067-019-04726-8