Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and risk of fetal and neonatal death: a meta-analysis with socioeconomic context indicators

The objective of the study was to summarize the results from observational studies examining the risk of fetal and neonatal death (perinatal death) as a function of the experience of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and examine the influence of socioeconomic context indicators on this asso...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2020-02, Vol.222 (2), p.123-133.e5
Hauptverfasser: Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe, Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel, Henares-Montiel, Jesús, Petrova, Dafina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 133.e5
container_issue 2
container_start_page 123
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 222
creator Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe
Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel
Henares-Montiel, Jesús
Petrova, Dafina
description The objective of the study was to summarize the results from observational studies examining the risk of fetal and neonatal death (perinatal death) as a function of the experience of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and examine the influence of socioeconomic context indicators on this association. Bibliographic searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and LILACS until March 2019. We considered observational studies that provided data on the association between intimate partner violence during pregnancy and perinatal death. Information collected included study characteristics, type, and prevalence of intimate partner violence and the reported association between intimate partner violence and perinatal death. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Two reviewers independently conducted all review procedures; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Meta-analyses were conducted based on the specific type of intimate partner violence (physical, psychological, sexual, unspecified) and also based on any type of intimate partner violence, considering 1 effect size per study, regardless of the type of intimate partner violence analyzed. Meta-regression analyses were performed to assess the possible effects of socioeconomic context. The proportion of deaths attributable to the exposure of intimate partner violence based on the crude data from the 3 cohort studies available also was calculated. Seventeen studies were included. The random-effects model showed a statistically significant increase in the odds of perinatal death among women exposed to unspecified intimate partner violence (odds ratio, 3.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–5.38), physical intimate partner violence (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.76–3.44), and any type of intimate partner violence during pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% confidence interval, 2.03–4.10). Meta-regression analysis showed stronger associations in countries with higher gross domestic product (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.04) and a higher percentage of health expenditure (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–1.46). The proportion of deaths attributable to exposure to intimate partner violence in cohort studies was attributable proportion, 60%; 95% confidence interval, 15–81%. Pregnant women who experience intimate partner violence during pregnancy may be about 3 times more likely to suffer perinatal death compared with
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.045
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2270003653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937819309573</els_id><sourcerecordid>2270003653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-814765d7c2329a7f22138d74217641b3831ab4887dacacb4a6c8f2b3470983ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UUuO1DAUtBCIaQYuwAJ5ySbBn3TsIDZoBMNII7GBtfViOz1uErux3QN9Bw6Rs-Rk46gHlqxK772qkl4VQq8pqSmh7bt9DfuwqxmhXU1ETZrtE7ShpBNVK1v5FG0IIazquJAX6EVK-3VkHXuOLjjlXUNasUF_bnx2E2SLDxCztxHfuzBary02x-j8Dh-i3Xnw-oTBm2WOLv1Y5jAs82AzjMtcttjb4KFM2FjId-8x4KkcK_AwnpJLy_zL5btlTkG7YHXwYXIaF8z2d8bOG6chh5heomcDjMm-esRL9P3zp29XX6rbr9c3Vx9vK823ba4kbUS7NUIzzjoQA2OUSyMaRkXb0J5LTqFvpBQGNOi-gVbLgfW8EaSTHDS_RG_PvocYfh5tympySdtxhPLIMSnGRMmKt1teqOxM1TGkFO2gDrHkFU-KErW2oPZqbUGtLSgiVGmhiN48-h_7yZp_kr-xF8KHM8GWL--djSppt4ZuXLQ6KxPc__wfADq9oDI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2270003653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and risk of fetal and neonatal death: a meta-analysis with socioeconomic context indicators</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe ; Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel ; Henares-Montiel, Jesús ; Petrova, Dafina</creator><creatorcontrib>Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe ; Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel ; Henares-Montiel, Jesús ; Petrova, Dafina</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the study was to summarize the results from observational studies examining the risk of fetal and neonatal death (perinatal death) as a function of the experience of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and examine the influence of socioeconomic context indicators on this association. Bibliographic searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and LILACS until March 2019. We considered observational studies that provided data on the association between intimate partner violence during pregnancy and perinatal death. Information collected included study characteristics, type, and prevalence of intimate partner violence and the reported association between intimate partner violence and perinatal death. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Two reviewers independently conducted all review procedures; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Meta-analyses were conducted based on the specific type of intimate partner violence (physical, psychological, sexual, unspecified) and also based on any type of intimate partner violence, considering 1 effect size per study, regardless of the type of intimate partner violence analyzed. Meta-regression analyses were performed to assess the possible effects of socioeconomic context. The proportion of deaths attributable to the exposure of intimate partner violence based on the crude data from the 3 cohort studies available also was calculated. Seventeen studies were included. The random-effects model showed a statistically significant increase in the odds of perinatal death among women exposed to unspecified intimate partner violence (odds ratio, 3.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–5.38), physical intimate partner violence (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.76–3.44), and any type of intimate partner violence during pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% confidence interval, 2.03–4.10). Meta-regression analysis showed stronger associations in countries with higher gross domestic product (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.04) and a higher percentage of health expenditure (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–1.46). The proportion of deaths attributable to exposure to intimate partner violence in cohort studies was attributable proportion, 60%; 95% confidence interval, 15–81%. Pregnant women who experience intimate partner violence during pregnancy may be about 3 times more likely to suffer perinatal death compared with women who do not experience intimate partner violence. It should be a priority to include intimate partner violence screenings or other detection strategies in pregnancy monitoring or family-planning programs because these could help avoid preventable perinatal deaths.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.045</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31394067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Female ; Fetal Death ; Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; intimate partner violence ; Intimate Partner Violence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Mass Screening ; meta-analysis ; Odds Ratio ; Perinatal Death ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology ; pregnancy outcome ; Prenatal Care ; Sex Offenses - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Socioeconomic Factors</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020-02, Vol.222 (2), p.123-133.e5</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-814765d7c2329a7f22138d74217641b3831ab4887dacacb4a6c8f2b3470983ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-814765d7c2329a7f22138d74217641b3831ab4887dacacb4a6c8f2b3470983ac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0654-5178 ; 0000-0002-3930-922X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.045$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31394067$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henares-Montiel, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrova, Dafina</creatorcontrib><title>Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and risk of fetal and neonatal death: a meta-analysis with socioeconomic context indicators</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>The objective of the study was to summarize the results from observational studies examining the risk of fetal and neonatal death (perinatal death) as a function of the experience of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and examine the influence of socioeconomic context indicators on this association. Bibliographic searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and LILACS until March 2019. We considered observational studies that provided data on the association between intimate partner violence during pregnancy and perinatal death. Information collected included study characteristics, type, and prevalence of intimate partner violence and the reported association between intimate partner violence and perinatal death. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Two reviewers independently conducted all review procedures; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Meta-analyses were conducted based on the specific type of intimate partner violence (physical, psychological, sexual, unspecified) and also based on any type of intimate partner violence, considering 1 effect size per study, regardless of the type of intimate partner violence analyzed. Meta-regression analyses were performed to assess the possible effects of socioeconomic context. The proportion of deaths attributable to the exposure of intimate partner violence based on the crude data from the 3 cohort studies available also was calculated. Seventeen studies were included. The random-effects model showed a statistically significant increase in the odds of perinatal death among women exposed to unspecified intimate partner violence (odds ratio, 3.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–5.38), physical intimate partner violence (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.76–3.44), and any type of intimate partner violence during pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% confidence interval, 2.03–4.10). Meta-regression analysis showed stronger associations in countries with higher gross domestic product (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.04) and a higher percentage of health expenditure (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–1.46). The proportion of deaths attributable to exposure to intimate partner violence in cohort studies was attributable proportion, 60%; 95% confidence interval, 15–81%. Pregnant women who experience intimate partner violence during pregnancy may be about 3 times more likely to suffer perinatal death compared with women who do not experience intimate partner violence. It should be a priority to include intimate partner violence screenings or other detection strategies in pregnancy monitoring or family-planning programs because these could help avoid preventable perinatal deaths.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Death</subject><subject>Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>intimate partner violence</subject><subject>Intimate Partner Violence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Mass Screening</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>Odds Ratio</subject><subject>Perinatal Death</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>pregnancy outcome</subject><subject>Prenatal Care</subject><subject>Sex Offenses - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UUuO1DAUtBCIaQYuwAJ5ySbBn3TsIDZoBMNII7GBtfViOz1uErux3QN9Bw6Rs-Rk46gHlqxK772qkl4VQq8pqSmh7bt9DfuwqxmhXU1ETZrtE7ShpBNVK1v5FG0IIazquJAX6EVK-3VkHXuOLjjlXUNasUF_bnx2E2SLDxCztxHfuzBary02x-j8Dh-i3Xnw-oTBm2WOLv1Y5jAs82AzjMtcttjb4KFM2FjId-8x4KkcK_AwnpJLy_zL5btlTkG7YHXwYXIaF8z2d8bOG6chh5heomcDjMm-esRL9P3zp29XX6rbr9c3Vx9vK823ba4kbUS7NUIzzjoQA2OUSyMaRkXb0J5LTqFvpBQGNOi-gVbLgfW8EaSTHDS_RG_PvocYfh5tympySdtxhPLIMSnGRMmKt1teqOxM1TGkFO2gDrHkFU-KErW2oPZqbUGtLSgiVGmhiN48-h_7yZp_kr-xF8KHM8GWL--djSppt4ZuXLQ6KxPc__wfADq9oDI</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe</creator><creator>Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel</creator><creator>Henares-Montiel, Jesús</creator><creator>Petrova, Dafina</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0654-5178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3930-922X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and risk of fetal and neonatal death: a meta-analysis with socioeconomic context indicators</title><author>Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe ; Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel ; Henares-Montiel, Jesús ; Petrova, Dafina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-814765d7c2329a7f22138d74217641b3831ab4887dacacb4a6c8f2b3470983ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Death</topic><topic>Health Expenditures - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>intimate partner violence</topic><topic>Intimate Partner Violence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Mass Screening</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>Odds Ratio</topic><topic>Perinatal Death</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>pregnancy outcome</topic><topic>Prenatal Care</topic><topic>Sex Offenses - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henares-Montiel, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrova, Dafina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe</au><au>Ruiz-Pérez, Isabel</au><au>Henares-Montiel, Jesús</au><au>Petrova, Dafina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and risk of fetal and neonatal death: a meta-analysis with socioeconomic context indicators</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>222</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>123</spage><epage>133.e5</epage><pages>123-133.e5</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>The objective of the study was to summarize the results from observational studies examining the risk of fetal and neonatal death (perinatal death) as a function of the experience of intimate partner violence during pregnancy and examine the influence of socioeconomic context indicators on this association. Bibliographic searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and LILACS until March 2019. We considered observational studies that provided data on the association between intimate partner violence during pregnancy and perinatal death. Information collected included study characteristics, type, and prevalence of intimate partner violence and the reported association between intimate partner violence and perinatal death. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Two reviewers independently conducted all review procedures; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Meta-analyses were conducted based on the specific type of intimate partner violence (physical, psychological, sexual, unspecified) and also based on any type of intimate partner violence, considering 1 effect size per study, regardless of the type of intimate partner violence analyzed. Meta-regression analyses were performed to assess the possible effects of socioeconomic context. The proportion of deaths attributable to the exposure of intimate partner violence based on the crude data from the 3 cohort studies available also was calculated. Seventeen studies were included. The random-effects model showed a statistically significant increase in the odds of perinatal death among women exposed to unspecified intimate partner violence (odds ratio, 3.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.88–5.38), physical intimate partner violence (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.76–3.44), and any type of intimate partner violence during pregnancy (odds ratio, 2.89; 95% confidence interval, 2.03–4.10). Meta-regression analysis showed stronger associations in countries with higher gross domestic product (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.04) and a higher percentage of health expenditure (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–1.46). The proportion of deaths attributable to exposure to intimate partner violence in cohort studies was attributable proportion, 60%; 95% confidence interval, 15–81%. Pregnant women who experience intimate partner violence during pregnancy may be about 3 times more likely to suffer perinatal death compared with women who do not experience intimate partner violence. It should be a priority to include intimate partner violence screenings or other detection strategies in pregnancy monitoring or family-planning programs because these could help avoid preventable perinatal deaths.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31394067</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.045</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0654-5178</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3930-922X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020-02, Vol.222 (2), p.123-133.e5
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2270003653
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Female
Fetal Death
Health Expenditures - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infant, Newborn
intimate partner violence
Intimate Partner Violence - statistics & numerical data
Mass Screening
meta-analysis
Odds Ratio
Perinatal Death
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - epidemiology
pregnancy outcome
Prenatal Care
Sex Offenses - statistics & numerical data
Socioeconomic Factors
title Intimate partner violence during pregnancy and risk of fetal and neonatal death: a meta-analysis with socioeconomic context indicators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T09%3A44%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intimate%20partner%20violence%20during%20pregnancy%20and%C2%A0risk%C2%A0of%C2%A0fetal%C2%A0and%20neonatal%20death:%20a%20meta-analysis%C2%A0with%C2%A0socioeconomic%20context%20indicators&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Pastor-Moreno,%20Guadalupe&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft.epage=133.e5&rft.pages=123-133.e5&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.045&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2270003653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2270003653&rft_id=info:pmid/31394067&rft_els_id=S0002937819309573&rfr_iscdi=true