Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging based on whole‐volume images of breast lesions

Background Breast diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is a novel MRI technique to assess breast cancer but the effectivity still remains to be improved. Purpose To investigate the performance of whole‐volume histogram parameters derived from a DKI model for differentiating benign and malignant breast l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2020-02, Vol.51 (2), p.627-634
Hauptverfasser: Li, Ting, Hong, Yuan, Kong, Dexing, Li, Kangan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Breast diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is a novel MRI technique to assess breast cancer but the effectivity still remains to be improved. Purpose To investigate the performance of whole‐volume histogram parameters derived from a DKI model for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. Study Type Retrospective. Population In all, 120 patients with breast lesions (62 malignant, 58 benign). Sequence DKI sequence with seven b‐values (0, 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, and 3000 s/mm2) and DWI sequence with two b‐values (0 and 1000 s/mm2) on 3.0T MRI. Assessment Histogram parameters of the DKI model (K and D) and the DWI model (ADC), including the minimum, maximum, mean, percentile values (25th, 50th, 75th, and 95th), standard deviation, kurtosis and skewness, were calculated by two radiologists for the whole lesion volume. Statistical Tests Student's t‐test was used to compare malignant and benign lesions. The diagnostic performances were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results Kmax, Dmin, and ADCmin had the highest area under the curve (AUC) (0.875, 0.830, and 0.847, respectively), sensitivity (85.5%, 74.2%, and 77.4%, respectively), and accuracy (85.0%, 79.2%, and 81.7%, respectively) in their individual histogram parameter groups, and Kmax was found to outperform Dmin and ADCmin. ADC histogram parameters (from ADCmin to ADCsd) were significantly lower than D histogram parameters in all groups. Data Conclusion Kmax, Dmin, and ADCmin were found to be better metrics than the corresponding average values for differentiating benign from malignant tumors. Histogram parameters derived from the DKI model provided more information and had better diagnostic performance than ADC parameters derived from the DWI model. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:627–634.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.26884