Automated versus subjective assessment of spatial and temporal MRI small bowel motility in Crohn's disease

To investigate whether subjective radiologist grading of motility on magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is as effective as software quantification, and to determine the combination of motility metrics with the strongest association with symptom severity. One hundred and five Crohn's disease...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical radiology 2019-10, Vol.74 (10), p.814.e9-814.e19
Hauptverfasser: Gollifer, R.M., Menys, A., Plumb, A., Mengoudi, K., Puylaert, C.A.J., Tielbeek, J.A.W., Ponsioen, C.Y., Vos, F.M., Stoker, J., Taylor, S.A., Atkinson, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate whether subjective radiologist grading of motility on magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is as effective as software quantification, and to determine the combination of motility metrics with the strongest association with symptom severity. One hundred and five Crohn's disease patients (52 male, 53 female, 16–68 years old, mean age 34 years old) recruited from two sites underwent MRE, including a 20 second breath-hold cine motility sequence. Each subject completed a Harvey–Bradshaw Index (HBI) symptom questionnaire. Five features within normally appearing bowel were scored visually by two experienced radiologists, and then quantified using automated analysis software, including (1) mean motility, (2) spatial motility variation, (3) temporal motility variation, (4) area of motile bowel, (5) intestinal distension. Multivariable linear regression derived the combination of features with the highest association with HBI score. The best automated metric combination was temporal variation (p
ISSN:0009-9260
1365-229X
DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2019.06.016