Physiological differences in sarcolemmal excitability between human muscles
Introduction The sarcolemmal resting membrane potential (RMP) affects muscle excitability, contractility, and force generation. However, there are limited In vivo data on the normal RMP of the human sarcolemma between muscles. We hypothesize that the in vivo RMP may differ between human muscles with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Muscle & nerve 2019-10, Vol.60 (4), p.433-436 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
The sarcolemmal resting membrane potential (RMP) affects muscle excitability, contractility, and force generation. However, there are limited In vivo data on the normal RMP of the human sarcolemma between muscles. We hypothesize that the in vivo RMP may differ between human muscles with different physiological roles.
Methods
Muscle velocity recovery cycles were recorded from a proximal antigravity muscle, the rectus femoris, and compared with paired recordings from a distal non‐antigravity muscle, the tibialis anterior, in 34 normal individuals.
Results
Significant differences in muscle relative refractory period (3.55 millseconds vs 3.87 milliseconds, P = .002), early supernormality (14.22% vs 10.50%, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0148-639X 1097-4598 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mus.26645 |