How to Identify Common Variable Immunodeficiency Patients Earlier: General Practice Patterns

Purpose Diagnostic delay is a major problem concerning common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). We aimed to determine the pattern of general practitioner (GP) consultations in individuals diagnosed with CVID within 3 years before the diagnosis and whether the risk of diagnosis was associated with th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical immunology 2019-10, Vol.39 (7), p.641-652
Hauptverfasser: Ilkjær, Frederik V., Rasmussen, Line D., Martin-Iguacel, Raquel, Westh, Lena, Katzenstein, Terese L., Hansen, Ann-Brit E., Nielsen, Thyge L., Larsen, Carsten S., Johansen, Isik S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Diagnostic delay is a major problem concerning common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). We aimed to determine the pattern of general practitioner (GP) consultations in individuals diagnosed with CVID within 3 years before the diagnosis and whether the risk of diagnosis was associated with the frequency of consultations or character of examinations. Methods We conducted a nested case-control study, identifying 132 adult CVID patients and 5940 age- and gender-matched controls from national registers during 1997–2013. We used conditional logistic regression to calculate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results The median number of consultations among individuals with CVID was more than twice that of the controls in all 3 years (3rd, 10; 2nd, 11.5; and 1st, 15.4 vs. 4). We found a statistically significant association between the number of consultations and the risk of a subsequent CVID diagnosis, independent of age and gender, but strongest in the individuals  60, respectively. Several examinations (i.e., blood tests for inflammation/infection and pulmonary function test) were associated with increased odds of a subsequent CVID diagnosis. Conclusion The risk of a CVID diagnosis was highly related to both the number of consultations and the character of examinations performed by the GP. CVID should be a differential diagnosis among patients with multiple consultations, especially in patients
ISSN:0271-9142
1573-2592
DOI:10.1007/s10875-019-00666-9