Technical note: Interchangeability and comparison of methane measurements in dairy cows with 2 noninvasive infrared systems

This study aimed to compare measurements of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in the breath of dairy cows kept in commercial conditions using the Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and nondispersive infrared spectroscopy (NDIR) methods. The measurement systems were in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 2019-10, Vol.102 (10), p.9512-9517
Hauptverfasser: Sypniewski, M., Strabel, T., Cieslak, A., Szumacher-Strabel, M., Pszczola, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study aimed to compare measurements of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations in the breath of dairy cows kept in commercial conditions using the Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and nondispersive infrared spectroscopy (NDIR) methods. The measurement systems were installed in an automated milking system. Measurements were carried out for 5 d using both systems during milkings. The measurements were averaged per milking, giving 467 observations of CH4 and CO2 concentrations of 44 Holstein Friesian cows. The Pearson correlation between observations from the 2 systems was 0.86 for CH4, 0.84 for CO2, and 0.88 for their ratio. The repeatability of FTIR (0.53 for CH4, 0.57 for CO2, and 0.28 for their ratio) was somewhat higher than that of NDIR (0.57 for CH4, 0.47 for CO2, and 0.25 for their ratio). The coefficient of individual agreement was 0.98 for CH4, 0.89 for CO2, and 0.89 for their ratio; the concordance correlation coefficient was 0.48 for both gases and 0.24 for their ratio. We showed that FTIR and NDIR give similar results in commercial farm conditions. They can therefore be used interchangeably to generate a larger data set, which could then be further used for genetic evaluation.
ISSN:0022-0302
1525-3198
DOI:10.3168/jds.2019-16258