Comparative Study of Pulsed Versus Continuous High‐Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation Using In Vitro and In Vivo Models

Objectives To compare the efficacy of pulsed high‐intensity focused ultrasound (PHIFU) versus continuous high‐intensity focused ultrasound (CHIFU) ablation at identical doses. Methods Continuous and pulsed HIFU (1200 J) at duty cycles (DCs) of 60% and 20% were examined for their capacity to ablate b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2020-02, Vol.39 (2), p.259-271
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Yanhao, Wang, Qi, Luo, Yong, Jiang, Lu, Zeng, Zihuan, Gan, Lidan, Chen, Jianli, Han, Hongfei, Zou, Jianzhong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To compare the efficacy of pulsed high‐intensity focused ultrasound (PHIFU) versus continuous high‐intensity focused ultrasound (CHIFU) ablation at identical doses. Methods Continuous and pulsed HIFU (1200 J) at duty cycles (DCs) of 60% and 20% were examined for their capacity to ablate bovine liver tissue in vitro and rabbit liver tissue in vivo. After ablation, grayscale changes and pathologic characteristics were observed or measured, and the tissue necrosis volume, energy efficiency factor, and average grayscale density were calculated. Results The pulsed mode generated greater liquefaction necrosis. An inconspicuous grayscale change was observed for PHIFU at a DC of 20% in some samples, which appeared as an elliptical cavity. The energy efficiency factor of PHIFU at a DC of 60% was significantly lower than that of CHIFU, as observed both in vitro and in vivo (P 
ISSN:0278-4297
1550-9613
DOI:10.1002/jum.15098