Why Science is not in conflict with religion

Science and religion have had a long, rich history of conflict, most famously with the case of Galileo, who was found guilty of heresy for discovering one of the basic truths of the solar system. Likewise, Charles Darwin has been vilified for the last 150 years for discovering a fundamental concept...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Humanist (Buffalo, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2016-05, Vol.76 (3), p.27
1. Verfasser: Cuevas, Joshua A
Format: Magazinearticle
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Science and religion have had a long, rich history of conflict, most famously with the case of Galileo, who was found guilty of heresy for discovering one of the basic truths of the solar system. Likewise, Charles Darwin has been vilified for the last 150 years for discovering a fundamental concept that underlies all of biology and medicine and unifies all of the life sciences. Certainly, there was a time when almost all scientists were theists. But that was also a time when almost all people at every level of society were theists. To publicly disavow the existence of God was, at best, to ensure ostracism and, at worst, to be forced to choose between death and renouncing the evidence compiled through a life's worth of work. At a more mundane level, most religions assert that their deity regularly intervenes in daily occurrences by choice or in reaction to followers' prayer requests.
ISSN:0018-7399
2163-3576