Porous tip contact force–sensing catheters for pulmonary vein isolation: performance in a clinical routine setting
Purpose In catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), contact force (CF)–sensing catheters with an irrigated tip are used to deliver radiofrequency (RF) energy to the tissue. The ThermoCool® Smarttouch™ Surroundflow catheter (STSF) integrates CF-sensing technology and a new porous tip for advanc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology 2020-03, Vol.57 (2), p.251-259 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
In catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF), contact force (CF)–sensing catheters with an irrigated tip are used to deliver radiofrequency (RF) energy to the tissue. The ThermoCool® Smarttouch™ Surroundflow catheter (STSF) integrates CF-sensing technology and a new porous tip for advanced external cooling. The aim was to evaluate the performance and safety of STSF in a clinical setting of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in comparison with standard contact force–sensing catheter (ST).
Methods
We assigned consecutive patients (
n
= 80, prospectively, open-label, non-randomized) with symptomatic AF to either PVI with STSF (
n
= 60) or ST (
n
= 20).
Results
Total ablation time to achieve PVI was significantly shorter in STSF compared to that in ST (STSF, 1556 ± 435 s vs. ST, 1922 ± 961 s;
p
= 0.045). Ablation time to achieve loss of pace capture of left pulmonary veins was shorter using STSF (left veins, 155 ± 140 s vs. 291 ± 188 s;
p
= 0.01; right veins, 208 ± 196 s vs. 369 ± 306 s;
p
= 0.09). Furthermore, administered irrigation fluid was significantly reduced in STSF (241.4 ± 79.6 ml vs. 540.3 ± 229.5 ml;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1383-875X 1572-8595 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10840-019-00591-2 |