Dynamic contrast‐enhanced and diffusion‐weighted MRI of invasive breast cancer for the prediction of sentinel lymph node status

Background Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the current standard for identifying lymph metastasis in breast cancer patients, there are complications of SLNB. Purpose To evaluate preoperative dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) and diffusion‐weighted imaging (D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2020-02, Vol.51 (2), p.615-626
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Eun Jung, Youk, Ji Hyun, Choi, Hyemi, Song, Ji Soo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Although sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the current standard for identifying lymph metastasis in breast cancer patients, there are complications of SLNB. Purpose To evaluate preoperative dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) and diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) of invasive breast cancer for predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis. Study Type Retrospective. Population In all, 309 patients who underwent clinically node‐negative invasive breast cancer surgery Field Strength/Sequence 3.0T, DCE‐MRI, DWI. Assessment We collected clinicopathologic variables (age, histologic and nuclear grade, extensive intraductal carcinoma component, lymphovascular invasion, and immunohistochemical profiles) and preoperative MRI features (tumor size, background parenchymal enhancement, internal enhancement, adjacent vessel sign, whole‐breast vascularity, initial enhancement pattern, kinetic curve types, quantitative kinetic parameters, tumoral apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC], peritumoral maximal ADC, and peritumoral‐tumoral ADC ratio). Statistical Tests Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to determine independent variables associated with SLN metastasis, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was analyzed for those variables. Results 41 (13.3%) of the patients showed SLN metastasis. With MRI, tumor size (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06–1.17), heterogeneous (OR, 5.33; 95% CI, 1.71–16.58), and rim (OR, 15.54; 95% CI, 2.12–113.72) enhancement and peritumoral–tumoral ADC ratio (OR, 72.79; 95% CI, 7.15–740.82) were independently associated with SLN metastasis. Clinicopathologic variables independently associated with SLN metastasis included age (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92–0.99) and CD31 (OR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.04–8.92). The area under the curve (AUC) of MRI features (0.80; 95% CI, 0.73–0.87) was significantly higher than for clinicopathologic variables (0.68; 95% CI, 0.60–0.77; P = 0.048) and was barely below statistical significance for combined MRI features with clinicopathologic variables (0.84; 95% CI 0.78–0.90, P = 0.057). Data Conclusion Preoperative internal enhancement on DCE‐MRI and peritumoral‐tumoral ADC ratio on DWI might be useful for predicting SLN metastasis in patients with invasive breast cancer. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:615–626.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.26865