Changes in the quality of life and acoustic speech parameters of patients in various stages of prosthetic rehabilitation with an obturator after maxillectomy

Prosthetic interventions at various stages help patients recover from esthetic and functional disabilities. However, little is known regarding their impact on patient quality of life (QOL) during various phases of treatment. The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate changes in the QOL and acoustic speech parameters of patients rehabilitated by using a prosthesis at various stages after undergoing maxillectomy. A total of 30 consecutive patients who underwent maxillectomy resection and successfully completed all phases of rehabilitation with obturator prostheses were included. The study was conducted in 4 phases. In the preoperative phase, patients were evaluated for QOL and speech, and dental impressions were made. In the immediate postoperative phase, patients were rehabilitated with a delayed surgical obturator on the fifth postoperative day and were evaluated for QOL and speech on the 12th postoperative day. In the interim obturator phase, patients were rehabilitated with an interim maxillary obturator between the 12th and 15th postoperative days and were evaluated for QOL and speech after using the prosthesis for a minimum of 1 week. In the definitive phase, nonradiated patients were rehabilitated with a definitive prosthesis in the sixth week, and radiated patients were rehabilitated with a definitive prosthesis in the sixth month. The QOL and speech parameters of the patients were evaluated after 1 week. QOL evaluation in each phase was performed by using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. Speech parameters, namely intensity, fundamental frequency, habitual frequency, jitter, shimmer, maximum phonation time, and the S/Z ratio, were measured by using acoustic speech software. The change in QOL over various phases of rehabilitation with an obturator was analyzed by using repeated measures analysis of variance, whereas changes in acoustic speech parameters were analyzed by using the Friedman test (α=.05). A statistically significant difference (P