Differences of methanogenesis between mesophilic and thermophilic in situ biogas-upgrading systems by hydrogen addition

To investigate the differences in microbial community structure between mesophilic and thermophilic in situ biogas-upgrading systems by H 2 addition, two reactors (35 °C and 55 °C) were run for four stages according to different H 2 addition rates (H 2 /CO 2 of 0:1, 1:1, and 4:1) and mixing mode (in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology 2019-11, Vol.46 (11), p.1569-1581
Hauptverfasser: Zhu, Xianpu, Chen, Liumeng, Chen, Yichao, Cao, Qin, Liu, Xiaofeng, Li, Dong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To investigate the differences in microbial community structure between mesophilic and thermophilic in situ biogas-upgrading systems by H 2 addition, two reactors (35 °C and 55 °C) were run for four stages according to different H 2 addition rates (H 2 /CO 2 of 0:1, 1:1, and 4:1) and mixing mode (intermittent and continuous). 16S rRNA gene-sequencing technology was applied to analyze microbial community structure. The results showed that the temperature is a crucial factor in impacting succession of microbial community structure and the H 2 utilization pathway. For mesophilic digestion, most of added H 2 was consumed indirectly by the combination of homoacetogens and strict aceticlastic methanogens. In the thermophilic system, most of added H 2 may be used for microbial cell growth, and part of H 2 was utilized directly by strict hydrogenotrophic methanogens and facultative aceticlastic methanogens. Continuous stirring was harmful to the stabilization of mesophilic system, but not to the thermophilic one.
ISSN:1367-5435
1476-5535
DOI:10.1007/s10295-019-02219-w