Visual search does not always predict performance in tasks that require finding targets among distractors: The case of line-ending illusory contours

The standard visual search task is integral to the study of selective attention and in search tasks target present slopes are the primary index of attentional demand. However, there are times when similarities in slopes may obscure important differences between conditions. To demonstrate this point, we used the case of line-ending illusory contours, building on a study by Li, Cave, and Wolfe (2008) where orientation-based search for figures defined by line-ending illusory contours was compared to that for the corresponding real-contour controls. Consistent with Li et al. (2008), we found search to be efficient for both illusory contour figures and the corresponding real-contour controls, with no significant differences between them. However, major differences between illusory contours and the real-contour controls emerged in selective enumeration, a task where participants enumerated targets in a display of distractors, with the number of targets and distractors manipulated. When looking at the distractor slopes, the increase in RT to enumerate a single target as a function of the number of distractors (a direct analogue to target present trials, with identical displays), we found distractor costs for illusory contour figures to be over 100 ms/distractor higher than for the corresponding real-contour controls. Furthermore, the discrepancies in RT slope between 1–3 and 6–8 targets associated with subitizing were only seen in the real-contour controls. These results show that similarities in RT slopes in search may mask important differences between conditions that emerge in other tasks. •Search equivalent for line-ending illusory contours and real-contour controls•Differences emerge in selective enumeration.•No subitizing and high distractor costs with illusory contour figures•Subitizing and low distractor costs with real-contour controls