Optimization of flare management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomized controlled trial

Introduction/objectives To evaluate the effect of a flare management intervention guided by non-physician providers versus usual care between rheumatology visits on flare occurrence and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. Methods Adult patients with established RA (per 2010 ACR criteria, n  ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical rheumatology 2019-11, Vol.38 (11), p.3025-3032
Hauptverfasser: Myasoedova, Elena, Crowson, Cynthia S., Giblon, Rachel E., McCarthy-Fruin, Kathleen, Schaffer, Daniel E., Wright, Kerry, Matteson, Eric L., Davis, John M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction/objectives To evaluate the effect of a flare management intervention guided by non-physician providers versus usual care between rheumatology visits on flare occurrence and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. Methods Adult patients with established RA (per 2010 ACR criteria, n  = 150) were randomized to the intervention arm ( n  = 75) versus usual care ( n  = 75). The Flare Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis (FLARE-RA) questionnaire was administered monthly during 24 months to all patients in the intervention arm to assess flare status. Telephone nurse-led counseling or an expedited visit with a rheumatology provider was offered to patients in the intervention arm who indicated they were in flare. Results Patients in the intervention arm completed a median of 8.5 (range 1–24) questionnaires. RA flare was reported on 122 (19%) of these questionnaires; average FLARE-RA score, 4.72 on 0 (no flare) to 10 (maximum flare) scale. Patients preferred an expedited clinic visit with a rheumatology provider during 39 (32%) of flares. The majority of patients preferred to self-manage their flare (76, 62%); some patients received nursing advice on flare management over the phone (7, 6%). There were no differences in RA flare by OMERACT9 definition, DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SDAI, anti-rheumatic treatment change by rheumatology provider, or remission by CDAI between the study arms over 24-month follow-up. Conclusions The flare management intervention did not have any major effect on flare occurrence or RA disease activity metrics over the 24-month follow-up. The majority of patients in the intervention arm preferred self-management to an expedited visit with their rheumatology provider. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02382783 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02382783 ) Key Points • The flare management intervention had no effect on rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. • Patients preferred self-management of their RA flares to expedited rheumatology provider visits.
ISSN:0770-3198
1434-9949
DOI:10.1007/s10067-019-04664-5