Electrocardiomatrix Facilitates Accurate Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Stroke Patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE—Cardiac telemetry is a routine part of inpatient ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack evaluation to assess for atrial fibrillation (AF). Yet, tools to assist stroke clinicians in the evaluation of the large quantities of telemetry data are limited. The investigators developed a new method to evaluate electrocardiographic signals, electrocardiomatrix, that was applied to stroke unit telemetry data to determine its feasibility, validity, and usefulness. Electrocardiomatrix displays telemetry data in a 3-dimensional matrix that allows for more accurate and less time consuming P-wave analysis. METHODS—In this single-center, prospective, observational study conducted in a stroke unit, all telemetry data from ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack patients were collected (April 2017–January 2018) for examination facilitated by electrocardiomatrix. AF>30 seconds was identified through review of electrocardiomatrix-generated matrices by a nonphysician researcher. Electrocardiomatrix results were compared with the clinical team’s medical record documentation of AF identified through telemetry. A study cardiologist reviewed the standard telemetry associated with all AF episodes identified by electrocardiomatrix and each case of disagreement. RESULTS—Telemetry data (median 46 hours [interquartile range22–90]) were analyzed among 265 unique subjects (88% ischemic stroke). Electrocardiomatrix was successfully applied in 260 (98%) of cases. The positive predictive value of electrocardiomatrix compared with the clinical documentation was 86% overall and 100% among the subset with no prior history of AF. For the 5 false-positive and 5 false-negative cases, expert overview disagreed with the clinical documentation and confirmed the electrocardiomatrix-based diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS—The application of electrocardiomatrix to stroke unit-acquired telemetry data is feasible and appears to have superior accuracy compared with traditional monitor analysis by noncardiologists.