Ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation of central intraductal papilloma: a prospective pilot study

Background: Central intraductal papilloma (IDP) has a low risk of cancer evolution; therefore, surgical treatment of IDP is controversial. We sought to validate ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for minimally invasive treatment of IDP. Methods: Thirteen women with central...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of hyperthermia 2019-01, Vol.36 (1), p.605-611
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Jie, Wu, Han, Meng, Xian-Wei, Mu, Meng-Juan, Dou, Jian-Ping, Ahmed, Muneeb, Liang, Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Central intraductal papilloma (IDP) has a low risk of cancer evolution; therefore, surgical treatment of IDP is controversial. We sought to validate ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) for minimally invasive treatment of IDP. Methods: Thirteen women with central IDP, including six with nipple discharge, underwent US-guided core needle biopsy and MWA from December 2016 to November 2017. Lesions histologically diagnosed as benign IDP were included. The hydro-dissection technique was used to protect the nipple during the entire ablation procedure. We evaluated and recorded data of complete ablation, volume reduction, and complications. Results: MWA was successfully performed in all patients, with 100% complete ablation, assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or contrast-enhanced US. Mean tumor size was 13.5 ± 4.1 (7.0-20.0) mm; the mean ablation time was 1.4 (0.7-10.3) min. At the median 13.7-month follow-up, mean lesion sizes at 3, 6, and 12 months after MWA were all significantly smaller than that at baseline. Total volume reduction rates were 52.3 ± 18.2% (range, 24.2-81.8%), 72.6 ± 23.1% (range, 39.4-95.9%), and 92.9 ± 7.5% (range, 75.0-100%) at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up, respectively, with significant differences (p 
ISSN:0265-6736
1464-5157
DOI:10.1080/02656736.2019.1619849