Anatomic and Functional Outcome Following Distal Shunt and Tunneling for Treatment İschemic Priapism: A Single-Center Experience

Ischemic priapism (IP) is a urologic emergency that requires early intervention. The main aim of IP treatment is to relieve the cavernosal pressure and provide erectile function. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between preoperative risk factors (patient’s age, duration of pria...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sexual medicine 2019-08, Vol.16 (8), p.1290-1296
Hauptverfasser: Ortaç, Mazhar, Çevik, Gökhan, Akdere, Hakan, Ermeç, Bahadır, Kadıoğlu, Ateş
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ischemic priapism (IP) is a urologic emergency that requires early intervention. The main aim of IP treatment is to relieve the cavernosal pressure and provide erectile function. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between preoperative risk factors (patient’s age, duration of priapism, preoperative erectile function) and postoperative erectile dysfunction (ED). This retrospective study consisted of 25 patients diagnosed with refractory IP between 2009–2017. The diagnosis of IP was confirmed by medical history, physical examination, and cavernosal blood gas analysis. All of the patients underwent the T-shunt procedure ± tunneling after a failed initial intervention. The mean age at the time of the IP diagnosis was 46.84 years (range 23–77). The average follow-up time of the study population was 40.4 months (range 3–114), and the median time from the occurrence of IP to surgery was 58 hours (range 24–240). In all cases, rapid resolution of the erection was achieved with the T-shunt ± tunneling procedure. In 1 patient, priapism recurred after 12 hours. Postoperative ED was reported by 16 (84.21%) patients, with degrees of mild, mild to moderate, and severe in 6, 1, and 9 of these cases, respectively. During the follow-up, the mean International Index of Erectile Function–5 (IIEF-5) score was 12.68 (range 5–23). Only 3 (15.78%) patients achieved successful sexual intercourse without any treatment. 6 (31.5%) patients required the aid of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, and 1 (5.26%) patient required the aid of a vacuum erection device. The 9 (47.36%) patients with severe ED failed to respond to medical treatment and were considered candidates for a penile implant. According to Kendall’s tau-b correlation coefficient analysis, there was a positive correlation between the preoperative and postoperative IIEF-5 scores (P = .005), whereas the patient’s age and duration of priapism were negatively correlated with the postoperative IIEF-5 score (P = .016 and P = .046, respectively). Treatment options of IP should be discussed with patients in terms of both preoperative erectile function and the duration of priapism. The small sample size and retrospective nature of this study were the main limitations. Despite high success and low complication rates of T-shunt surgery, the rate of undisturbed erectile function is only 14.6%. The patient’s age, the existence of preoperative ED, and the duration of priapism are associated with postoperative IIEF-5
ISSN:1743-6095
1743-6109
DOI:10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.05.011