Labor epidural analgesia onset time and subsequent analgesic requirements: a prospective observational single-center cohort study
•Labor epidural analgesia (LEA) onset time may predict pain later in labor.•There was a significant correlation between onset time and pain intensity at 60 min.•Women with more pain at 60 min also had more pain at 120 min.•Women with more pain at 60 min required more local anesthetic during labor. W...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of obstetric anesthesia 2019-11, Vol.40, p.39-44 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Labor epidural analgesia (LEA) onset time may predict pain later in labor.•There was a significant correlation between onset time and pain intensity at 60 min.•Women with more pain at 60 min also had more pain at 120 min.•Women with more pain at 60 min required more local anesthetic during labor.
We investigated the correlation between lumbar epidural analgesia onset time and pain intensity at 60 and 120 min after initiation.
We conducted a prospective observational study of nulliparous women receiving lumbar epidural analgesia (initial bolus 15 mL bupivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 3.33 μg/mL), followed by patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). The measured variable was lumbar epidural analgesia onset time (time to pain numerical rating score ≤3). Secondary outcomes were pain score at 60 and 120 min and at full dilatation; and analgesic requirements through the labor.
One-hundred-and-five women were eligible for analysis. There was a significant correlation between lumbar epidural analgesia onset time and pain intensity at 60 min (Spearman’s R2=0.286, P=0.003), but not at 120 min (R2=0.030, P=0.76). Women who requested more PCEA boluses during the first 120 min had a longer lumbar epidural analgesia onset time (R2=0.321, P=0.001) and reported higher pain scores at 60 min (R2=0.588, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0959-289X 1532-3374 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.05.008 |