Digital droplet PCR‐based chimerism analysis for monitoring of hematopoietic engraftment after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a curative approach for multiple hematologic diseases. The success of alloHSCT is evaluated by analyzing the proportion of living donor cells in blood and bone marrow samples of the recipient (chimerism analysis). To monit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of laboratory hematology 2019-10, Vol.41 (5), p.615-621
Hauptverfasser: Mika, Thomas, Baraniskin, Alexander, Ladigan, Swedlana, Wulf, Gerald, Dierks, Sascha, Haase, Detlef, Schork, Karin, Turewicz, Michael, Eisenacher, Martin, Schmiegel, Wolff, Schroers, Roland, Klein‐Scory, Susanne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a curative approach for multiple hematologic diseases. The success of alloHSCT is evaluated by analyzing the proportion of living donor cells in blood and bone marrow samples of the recipient (chimerism analysis). To monitor the engrafted cells, donor's individual genetic markers are analyzed in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples, usually by using short tandem repeat (STR) analysis. An alternative method to measure chimerism is based on insertion and deletion markers (InDels) analyzed by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR); however, this approach is rarely evaluated in clinical practice. Methods In this study, we examined the usefulness of ddPCR‐based chimerism analysis against the standard STR analysis in samples around day+30 after alloHSCT in clinical practice using peripheral blood and bone marrow samples. Results The median absolute difference between ddPCR and STR analysis was 0.55% points for bone marrow chimerisms and 0.25% points for peripheral blood chimerisms, respectively, including variation in the range of maximum 2% for both methods. The results of every single sample gave the same clinical message. Conclusion According to our data, chimerism analysis by ddPCR has an excellent correlation with STR‐based analyses. Due to its fast and easy applicability, the ddPCR technique is suitable for chimerism monitoring in clinical practice.
ISSN:1751-5521
1751-553X
DOI:10.1111/ijlh.13073